What are the weaknesses of a stone keep castle?

11
Jared Fisher asked a question: What are the weaknesses of a stone keep castle?
Asked By: Jared Fisher
Date created: Wed, May 5, 2021 5:19 PM
Date updated: Sun, Jul 3, 2022 3:56 AM

Content

Top best answers to the question «What are the weaknesses of a stone keep castle»

Stone keep castles were a lot bigger than motte and bailey castles and were able to hold more soldiers. Because of their vast size they were much harder to attack. However, they had two main weaknesses - there was nothing to be done if the enemy surrounded except remain in the castle.

10 other answers

They took too long to make and they cost alot of money, plus, the English mined underneath the castles which caused that corner to give way and collapse. This made it easy for the English to attack a castle. :D

What are the strengths and weaknesses of a stone keep castle? There are many strengths and weaknesses of a stone keep castle. attackers. The height also makes it easier to foresee attacks miles...

What were the strengths and weaknesses of a stone keep Castle? Stone keep castles were a lot bigger than motte and bailey castles and were able to hold more soldiers. Because of their vast size they were much harder to attack. However, they had two main weaknesses – there was nothing to be done if the enemy surrounded except remain in the castle.

Here are the advantages and disadvantages of Stone Keep Castles (Stone Castles): Advantages They don't rot within a few decades but will last for centuries to come They don't burn as the castles...

Although the wooden structure was much more vulnerable to damage than a stone structure, a motte and bailey castle could be built quickly until the Normans had the time to build more permanent stone structures. The major weakness of the motte and bailey castle was the likelihood of the keep rotting or burning down. What are square keep castles?

The primary advantage of a stone keep castle is that it was tremendously difficult to attack, requiring a large army, siege weapons, and enough... See full answer below. Become a member and unlock...

There are quite a few problems with the wooden Motte and Bailey castles because the wood may rot and the wood is easy to burn which would make it easy for attackers. Stone keep The stone keep castle was the next step up from the Motte and Bailey because it was made for comfort as well as a sign of power.

-The castles keep was a safe place from attack. Disadvantages-Stone castles were expensive to build.-Attackers could target vulnerable areas by tunnelling through.-The towers could be badly damaged by attackers' weapons. Did you know? Stone Keep Castles could have really big fireplaces which Motte and Bailey Castles couldn't have otherwise they would have burnt down. A Historical Challenge For You! Get your kids to think about: Would you have wanted to live in a Stone Keep Castle?

However, stone keep castles did contain some military flaws, although admittedly they were flaws that only became more apparent as time went on, for example, the square shape of the keep created ‘dead space’ which defenders could not shoot at with crossbows, and which could aid attackers.

At a glance: the disadvantages of concentric castles They were phenomenally expensive to build – this can’t be overstated! They took significant time to build – they needed years, rather than just weeks for basic motte-and-bailey castle

Your Answer